User agent detail

lwp-trivial/1.41
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
yeslwpBot/Crawler0 Detail
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/misc.yaml
HTTP Library perlcloseUNKNOWN closeclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yeslwpBot/Crawler0 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyeslwpclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
lwp-trivial 1.41closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

LWP::Simple 1.41close software-librarycloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyeslwp-trivialCrawler0.1092 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesPerlclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library perlclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:19 | by ThaDafinser