User agent detail

Opera/9.24 (X11; SunOS i86pc; U; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
Opera 9.24 Solaris desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.24Presto 2.0SunOS Desktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.24closeSunOS closecloseDesktopclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.24closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.24closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.24Presto Solaris desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.24closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.24closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.24 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.24closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.24 SunOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.24 Solaris desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.24closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.24closeSolaris closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:19 | by ThaDafinser