User agent detail

Mercury/830 CFNetwork/672.0.8 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
Mercury 0.0WebKit unknowniOS 7.0Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Mercury WebKit iOS 7.0AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Mercury closeiOS closecloseMobile Deviceyesyesclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Mercury 830closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mercury close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mercury Browser 8.3.0closeiOS 7.0.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mercury 830 iOS 7.0yes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 672.0.8closeiOS 7.0Applecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mercury Browser 830 Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mercury Browser 8.3.0 iOS 7.0.3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
CFNetwork App 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:17 | by ThaDafinser