User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SmartHub; U; Maple2012) AppleWebKit/535.20+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/535.20+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Webkit 535.20 televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 535.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 535.20+close closecloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 535.20close media-playercloseclose0.20141 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit 0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 535.20close closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari WebKit 535.20 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 535.20 SamsungSmart TV 2012televisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:16 | by ThaDafinser