UserAgentStringCom overview -

We took 33364 different user agents and analyzed them with this provider
Group Percent Total Actions
Results found 78.24%
26103 Not detected
Browser names 76.46%
25511 Detected Not detected
Engine name Not available with this provider
Operating systems 67.87%
22645 Detected Not detected
Device brands Not available with this provider
Device models Not available with this provider
Device types Not available with this provider
Is mobile Not available with this provider
Is bot 592 Detected Not detected
Bot names 592 Detected Not detected
Bot types 592 Detected Not detected

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-17 08:25:48 | by ThaDafinser