User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; 101P11C Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1162.61647
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Panasonic101P11C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1162.61647closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162.61647closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1162.61647closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 15.0.1162closeAndroid 4.1.1Panasonic101P11Ccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 15.0.1162.61647WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.1.1101P11Ctabletyescloseclose0.078 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1162.61647closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.05101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:51 | by ThaDafinser