User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; ru; SonyEricssonK790i) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.449 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
UC Browser 9.5JAVA unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close SonyEricssonK790imobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 Sony EricssonK790ismartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0close SonyEricssonK790icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.449 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson K790icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Sony EricssonK790imobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close SonyEricssonK790iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:50 | by ThaDafinser