User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; xx; rv:1.9.3a4pre) Gecko/20100405 Minefield/3.7a4pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firefox Minefield 3.7a4Windows 7Gecko 1.9.3a4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.7Gecko 1.9.3Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Minefield) 3.7a4precloseWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Minefield (3.7)Gecko Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Minefield) 3.7.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Minefield 3.7a4precloseWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.11801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Minefield 3.7a4preGecko 20100405Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Minefield 3.7a4Gecko 1.9.3a4Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:50 | by ThaDafinser