User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; Series60/5.0 Samsung/I8910;; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 BrowserNG/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungI8910 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0SamsungI8910smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4SamsungI8910closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia Browser --closeSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 525Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Browser Webkit 525Series60 5.0SamsungOmnia HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.4SamsungGT-I8910Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:50 | by ThaDafinser