User agent detail

Dillo/2.1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-291.php
Dillo 2.1Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dillo 2.1 Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dillo 2.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dillo 2.1.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dillo 2.1Dillo 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dillo 2.1.1close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dillo 2.1.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Dillo 2.1.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dillo 2.1.1 closeclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:49 | by ThaDafinser