User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Thunderbird 31.8Linux unknown31.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Thunderbird 31.8Gecko 31.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.06301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Thunderbird 31.8.0closeLinux email-clientcloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Thunderbird 31.8 GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Thunderbird 31.8.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Thunderbird 31.8.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 31.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Thunderbird 31.8.0Gecko 31.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:49 | by ThaDafinser