User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110516 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Firefox 3.6Ubuntu 10.041.9.2 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Ubuntu 10.04Linux DesktopDesktop0.08701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.13closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Ubuntu 10.04desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.13closeUbuntu 10.4closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.13Gecko 20110516Linux 10.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.13Gecko 1.9.2Ubuntu 10.04desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.13closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:49 | by ThaDafinser