User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3; HTC_Sensation_Z710e; da-dk) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/533.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-323.php
Android 4.0Android unknownunknown HTCSensationMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android HTCSensationMobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit Mac 10.6HTCSensation Z710esmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.0closeMac OS X 10.6.3HTCSensation Z710ecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.0WebKit 533.16Mac OS X 10.6.3HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit Android HTCSensation Z710emobile:smartyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0closeMac OS X 10.6.3HTCZ710Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:49 | by ThaDafinser