User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; en-us ; LG-P990H Build/FRG83G) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.3.0.143/145/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGP990H Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.2LGOptimus 2XMobile Phoneyes0.11701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3WebKit Android 2.2LGP990Hsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0closeAndroid 2.2.2LGP990Hcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.0.143WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.2LGLGP990Hcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.3Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.2LGOptimus 2X Speedmobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.08701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:49 | by ThaDafinser