User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (; ST; FLTk3D; 1.0; 1.0;) NetFront/3.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
STFLTk3D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HbbTV 1.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront Toshiba40PX200tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close STFLTk3Dcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 STFLTk3Dtelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:47 | by ThaDafinser