User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; pl; rv:1.9.0.16) Gecko/2010021013 Firefox/3.0.16 Flock/2.5.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Flock 2.5.6Windows 7Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Flock 2.0Gecko Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Flock 2.5.6closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Flock 2.5Gecko Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.16closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Flock 2.5.6closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Flock 2.5.6closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Flock 2.5.6Gecko 2010021013Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Flock 2.5.6Gecko 1.9.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0.16closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:47 | by ThaDafinser