User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; zh-cn;GiONEE-V182/V182 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit534.30(KHTML,like Gecko)Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 Id/6B4B39B8CF813EE614E29ACE4FA26DD9 RV/4.2.0 GNBR/1.7.1.ai (securitypay,securityinstalled)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Android Browser Android 4.2.2WebKit GioneeV182smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Version 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2GioneeV182smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2GioneeV182closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.4GioneeV182mobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:47 | by ThaDafinser