User agent detail

NexianNX-G963/MTK Release/01.01.2011/MAUI Browser/Opera Profile/MIDP2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1 Opera/9.80 (MTK; U; xx) Presto/2.5.28 Version/10.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Opera Mobile 10.10MRE Presto 2.5.28NexianNX-G963mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.10closeMRE NexianNX-G963mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.10Presto MTK / Nucleus NexianNX-G963smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.10close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.10Presto 2.5.28 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.5.28MRE NexianNX-G963mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:47 | by ThaDafinser