User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.2; xx; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031006 Firebird/0.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firebird 0.7Windows 8Gecko 1.5desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.5Gecko 1.5 Desktop0.07301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firebird (old name for Firefox) 0.7closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.24902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firebird 0.7Gecko Windows 8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firebird 0.7closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firebird 0.7closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firebird 0.7Gecko 20031006Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firebird 0.7Gecko 1.5Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:45 | by ThaDafinser