User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/5.1.171/24.890; U; en) Presto/2.5.25 176X220 Samsung SCH-U640
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-U640 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.1.171close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.1Presto Brew SamsungSCH-U640smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.1.171close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.1.171closeBREW SamsungSCH-U640closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.1.171close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.1.171Presto 2.5.25 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.5.25Brew SamsungSCH-U640mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.0close SamsungSCH-U660Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:45 | by ThaDafinser