User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_3) AppleWebKit/536.28.10 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
Apple Mail 6.0MacOSX 10.8unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Apple Mail 6.0WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.04901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 536.28.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeOS X 10.8.3email-clientcloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.8desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X 10.8.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AppleMail 536.28.10closeMac OS X 10.8.3closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X 10.8.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 536.28.10Mac OS X 10.8.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 536.28.10OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:44 | by ThaDafinser