User agent detail

Sogou inst spider/4.0(+http://www.sogou.com/docs/help/webmasters.htm
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Sogou closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesSogou Web Spiderclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesSogou SpiderSearch bot0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSogou inst spiderclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyessogou spiderCrawler0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sogou "Search Dog" closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesSogou Web Spiderclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:44 | by ThaDafinser