User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-i908E_CMCC/1.0 Release/03.07 Browser/IE6 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UCWEB7.4.1.61/31/800
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-i908E Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows GenericWindows Mobilemobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.4 Windows CE SamsungSGH-i908Esmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.4.1closeWindows CE SamsungSGH-i908Ecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.4.1.61closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.09601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.4.1.61 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.4Gecko Windows Mobile Samsungi908mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:44 | by ThaDafinser