User agent detail

MOT-spice/ Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; pt-br; spice Build/SESLA_U3_01.72.0) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Motorolaspice Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.1-update1GenericAndroid 2.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1Motorolaspicesmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1.0Motorolaspicecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1-update1closecloseclosecloseclose0.11401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 530.17Android 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1Spicemobile:smartyescloseclose0.079 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:43 | by ThaDafinser