User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! Slurp; http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/ysearch/slurp
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-147.php
yesYahoo! SlurpBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesYahoo! SlurpBot/Crawler0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesYahoo! Slurpclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesYahoo! SlurpSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesYahoo! Slurpclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! SlurpCrawler0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yahoo! Slurp Web Crawler Bot closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesYahoo! Slurpclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! Slurpclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:43 | by ThaDafinser