User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S3770K/S3770KDDKH4 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
Touchwiz SamsungChamp 3Gmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Samsung JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.05401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S3770K S3770KDDKH4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeTouchwiz SamsungChamp 3Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungGT-S3770Ksmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-S3770Kcloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Touchwiz SamsungChamp 3Gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-3770Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:42 | by ThaDafinser