User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dragon/45.6.11.385 Chrome/45.0.2454.93 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
Dragon 45.6WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 45.6Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 45.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 45.0.2454closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.93WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo Dragon 45.6Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:42 | by ThaDafinser