User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; SGP521 Build/17.1.A.2.36) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 32.0Android 4.4unknown SonyXperia Tablet Z2 LTETabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet Z2 LTETabletyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet Z2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.4.2SonySGP521closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.4.2SonyXperia Tablet Z2tabletyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.4SonySGP521Tabletyesyescloseclose0.053 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:42 | by ThaDafinser