User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows 98; U; xx) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.62
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 11.62Windows 98Presto 2.10.229desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.62Presto 2.10Win98 98Windows DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.62closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.62Presto Windows 98desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.62closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.62closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.62closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.62Presto 2.10.229Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.62Presto 2.10.229Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.62closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:41 | by ThaDafinser