User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.154 Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1387.82
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-182.php
Opera 20.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 20.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1387.82closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 20.0.1387.82closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 20.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1387.82closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 20.0.1387closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.154closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 20.0.1387.82WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 20.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1387.82closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeMac OS X 1091Desktopcloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:41 | by ThaDafinser