User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.5.33867/35.3088; U; xx) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-threadx.yaml
Opera Mini 4.5 Presto 2.8.119mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 4.5Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 4.5.33867closeJVM OperaMini 4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 4.5Presto 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 4.5.33867close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 4.5.33867close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 4.5.33867close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 4.5.33867Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 4.5Presto 2.8.119 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 4.5close OperaMini 4Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:41 | by ThaDafinser