User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; GomezAgent 2.0; Windows NT)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
yes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGomezAgentclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.1Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.0.1 Windows desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:41 | by ThaDafinser