User agent detail

MQQBrowser/36 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 4S; CPU iPhone OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9B206 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
QQbrowser 0.0iOS 5.1unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 36closeiOS 5.1.1SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 36WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPhone 4Ssmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 36closeiOS 5.1.1closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.084 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 36WebKit 534.46iOS 5.1.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 3.6Webkit 534.46iOS 5.1.1AppleiPhone 4Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1.1closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:39 | by ThaDafinser