User agent detail

envolk[ITS]spider/1.6 ( http://www.envolk.com/envolkspider.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
envolk[ITS]spider 1.6 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesEnvolkBot/Crawler0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
envolk closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesenvolk[ITS]spiderclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesenvolk[ITS]spiderCrawler0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:38 | by ThaDafinser