User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; AT300 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.133 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ToshibaAT300 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0ToshibaRegza AT300Tabletyesyes0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.0.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.269 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0ToshibaRegza AT300tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.3ToshibaAT300closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.187 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.133WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.433 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.3ToshibaRegza AT300tabletyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0ToshibaAT300Tabletyesyescloseclose0.08301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:38 | by ThaDafinser