User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; Desktop) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.2.0.336
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
UC Browser 9.2WinVista 6.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2WebKit WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.336close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.217 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.336WebKit 534.13Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:37 | by ThaDafinser