User agent detail

MOT-MOTORAZRV9x/9E.00.DFR BER2.2 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; 13003280) Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera 8.60 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaMOTORAZRV9x Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.60close desktop-browsercloseclose0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.60Presto MotorolaMOTORAZRV9xsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.60close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.60close MotorolaMOTORAZRV9xcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.60close closecloseclosecloseclose0.136 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.60 DROID RAZRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini MotorolaMOTORAZRV9xmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaMOTORAZR V9xFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:37 | by ThaDafinser