User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (BREW; U; 3.1.5; en) AppleWebKit/528.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) OBIGO/W1.0 Safari/528.5 480X800 LGE VX11K
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGVX11K Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 528.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 528.5close desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo W1WebKit Brew LGVX11Ksmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 1.0closeBREW LGVX11Kcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo W1 Browser W1WebKit 528.5a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.426 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo W 1.0Webkit 528.5Brew 3.1.5LGVX11mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:37 | by ThaDafinser