User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1-1.0.3; ru-ru; TB-805A Build/ECLAIR) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TexetTB-805A Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 530.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.0TB-805Amobile-browseryescloseclose0.277 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1.0TexetTB-805Acloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1-update1-1.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.139 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 530.17Android 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.426 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.0TB-805Amobile:smartyescloseclose0.079 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:36 | by ThaDafinser