User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; InettvBrowser/2.2 (00014A;SonyDTV140;0001;0001) ; CC/JPN) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4 Presto 2.12.407SonySmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Linux DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.224 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux SonyDTV140smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.50closeLinux SonyDTV140closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.144 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2Presto 2.12.407Linux Sony Digital TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 SonySmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:36 | by ThaDafinser