User agent detail

Vodafone/1.0/HTC_Diamond Opera/9.50 (Windows Mobile 6.1; U; de)[b][/b]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDiamond Opera Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 9.50Presto 2.2 HTCDiamondMobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 9.50closeWindows HTCTouch Diamondmobile-browseryescloseclose0.256 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.50Presto Windows Mobile 6.1HTCDiamond Operasmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50closeWindows Mobile HTCDiamond Operacloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.50closeWindows Mobile closecloseclosecloseclose0.087 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.50 Windows Mobile HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.50 Windows Mobile 6.1HTCTouch Diamondmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close HTCDiamondFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:36 | by ThaDafinser