User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; Humax; HM-9504HD; 0.01.06; 1.0; scrlgnnew; ); ce-html/1.0; xx) Presto/2.10.250 Version/11.60
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 11.60GNU/Linux Presto 2.10.250HumaxHM-9504HDtv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.60Presto 2.10Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.60closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.60Presto GNU/Linux HumaxHM-9504HDtv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux HumaxHM-9504HDcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.60Presto 2.10.250Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.2Presto 2.10.250 HumaxHM-9504HD Digital Receivertelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:35 | by ThaDafinser