User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; POV_TAB-PROTAB26 Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.94 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
POVTAB-PROTAB26 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.17002 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.257 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.1Point of ViewProTab 26 XXL IPStabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.1.1POVTAB-PROTAB26closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.106 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.94Blink Android 4.1.1Point Of ViewProTab 26tabletyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Point of ViewPROTAB 26Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:34 | by ThaDafinser