User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; U; en-us) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.67 like Chrome/39.0.2171.93 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Silk 3.67Android unknownunknown AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.67Blink Android AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.67closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 39.0Blink GNU/Linux AmazonKindle Firetabletyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.67closeLinux AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.109 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.67WebKit 537.36Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.67Blink FireOS AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 1.0closeAndroid 2.3AmazonD01400Tabletyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:34 | by ThaDafinser