User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1180.89 Safari/537.1; 360Spider
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yes360SpiderBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yes360SpiderBot/Crawler0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.89closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 21.0.1180.89closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes360SpiderSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.89closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyes360Spiderclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 21.0.1180.89closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
360Spider WebKit 537.1Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyes360spiderclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.89closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:34 | by ThaDafinser