User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; Microsoft Outlook 14.0.7149; ms-office; MSOffice 14)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-666.php
Outlook 2010Win7 6.17.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Outlook 2010Trident 7.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Outlook 2010 closeWindows 6.1email-clientcloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Outlook 2010closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose3.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.369 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Microsoft Office 14Trident 7.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:34 | by ThaDafinser