User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1; M571C Build/LMY47D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/40.0.2214.114 Mobile Safari/537.36 LieBaoFast/3.17.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/phablet.yml
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214.114Android 5.1Blink MeizuM2 Notephablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 5.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.292 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 40.0Blink Android 5.1MeizuM2 Notephabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214closeAndroid 5.1M571Ccloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.088 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.114WebKit 537.36Android 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.426 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LieBaoFast 3.17.4Blink Android 5.1MeizuM2 Notemobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 40closeAndroid 5.1MeizuM571CSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:33 | by ThaDafinser