User agent detail

JUC(Linux;U;Android2.3.6;Zh_cn;Micromax A50;240*320;)UCWEB7.8.0.95/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 7.8Android 2.3.6 MicromaxA50 Ninjamobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.316 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Android MicroMaxA50smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8 Android 2.3.6MicromaxA50 Ninjamobile:smartyescloseclose0.125 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:32 | by ThaDafinser