User agent detail

Opera/8.54 (Windows 95; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 8.54Windows 95 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 8.54Presto 1.0Win95 95Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.54closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.54closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.54Presto Windows 95desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.54closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.54closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.54closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.079 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.54 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 8.54 Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.54closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 8.52closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:32 | by ThaDafinser