User agent detail

ERO247 Android Application (16, ero247 v2.2.2) - samsung GT-P5200 samsung - FFFFFFFF-E6C8-D0A9-39C6-00476C617588
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
samsungGT-P5200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ERO247 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid SamsungGalaxy Tab 3 (10.1)mobile-browseryescloseclose0.278 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android SamsungGALAXY Tab 3 10.1"tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid samsungGT-P5200closeclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android SamsungGalaxy Tab 3 (10.1)tabletyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:31 | by ThaDafinser